“Recoding Affective Labor: Feminist Perspectives on Algorithmic Care Work”

From humanoid robots providing care for the elderly in Japan, to algorithmically-driven forms of psychotherapy, to the use of apps to diagnose and treat mental health challenges and neurodevelopmental difference, artificial intelligence (AI) is redefining affective labor in the contemporary era. Our research brings intersectional feminist perspectives to bear on newly emerging forms of AI-centered care work, asking how “care” is itself being recoded through these new technologies. Care, as a form of affective labor, has long been feminized and racialized. How do the algorithms produced through new AI technologies articulate with gendered and racialized assumptions about intimacy, empathy, and personhood? To what extent do new AI-generated technologies of care reinforce or reconfigure hegemonic discourses of gender, race, and culture?

Funded by a CSW/Streisand Center Faculty Grant, we are conducting preliminary interviews with app developers, medical researchers, software engineers, CTOs (Chief Technology Officers), and venture capitalists in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles who are focused on applying machine learning to mental health and neurdevelopmental diagnosis and treatment. We are asking those involved in developing these technologies how they conceptualize their work and endeavor to use AI to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of mental health challenges and neurodevelopmental difference. At a time when rates of diagnoses in both these domains are steadily increasing, our research asks how gendered and racialized conceptions of normativity, neurotypicality, and sociality are encoded into AI-focused care strategies down to the very algorithms on which they rely.

Fig. 1. Artificial Intelligence System for Robot-Assisted Treatment of Autism. The schema shows how the child-robot interaction loop and the software modules used by the robot to interact with the child: the Robot Intelligent Module (RIM) and the Behavior Manager (BM). The RIM is composed of 4 components: head pose, body posture, eye contact, and facial expression. The BM consist of two components: the treatment protocol and the NAOqi API.


Image citation:

Palestra, Giuseppe, Berardina De Carolis, and Floriana Esposito, 2017. “Artificial Intelligence for Robot-Assisted Treatment of Autism.” In D. Impedovo and G. Pirlo (Eds.), Workshop on Artificial Intelligence with Application in Health, Bari, Italy, November 14.



People


Faier and Mankekar

Purnima Mankekar

Purnima Mankekar’s current research is on AI, digital media, and affect. Her teaching interests include digital and “virtual” anthropology; theories of affect; feminist anthropology; postcolonial and women of color feminisms; and South Asian/American Studies.

Her books include Screening Culture, Viewing Politics and Unsettling India: Affect, Temporality, TransnationalityCaste and Outcast (with Gordon Chang and Akhil Gupta) and Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia (with Louisa Schein). She has held fellowships at Duke; the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard; Stanford Humanities Center; and Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.


Lieba Faier

Lieba Faier is a feminist ethnographer whose research explores relationships between transnational political-economic processes and the making of lives, communities, and landscapes in Japan, the Philippines, and the United States.

Her books include Intimate Encounters: Filipina Women and the Remaking of Rural Japan; Matsutake Worlds (coedited with Michael Hathaway for the Matsutake Worlds Research Group); and, forthcoming, The Banality of Good: The UN’s Global Fight against Human Trafficking.  Her articles have appeared in Cultural Anthropology, American Ethnologist; Annual Review of Anthropology, IJURR, and Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.